I didn’t have any outright crashes in either, but I did experience some minor oddities in both. If you need to open and close virtual machines all day, these time savings could add up.īoth virtualization apps are relatively stable. In some very simple testing, I found that Parallels is notably faster at each of those tasks, but particularly at suspending and resuming. The two virtualization apps do differ in speed-not the speed of the virtual OSes themselves or the apps in them, but the speed with which they open, sleep, resume, and shut down those OSes. There are a few differences, though, and that’s what I focused on in assessing the latest versions of each. They offer similar features, similar performance, and at times, even look similar. Those first two options are the most popular-and, for most users, the most sensible-alternatives.Īnother result of this competition is that the two programs have evolved into near twins of each other. Four main options are now available: two commercial virtualization apps ( Parallels Desktop for Mac and VMware Fusion), an open source alternative ( VirtualBox), and another solution that lets you install Windows apps without installing Windows ( Crossover). Since then, however, virtualization apps for the Mac have matured a lot.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |